#Cannon digi troll iv motherboard driver#
#Cannon digi troll iv motherboard pro#
#Cannon digi troll iv motherboard plus#

IBM 2.0).Īnd please stop giving any more awful suggestions to either AMD or Intel about handicapping their mainstream platforms to 8 cores. If they do not get their act together and go through a complete management re-structure, I'm 100% certain we will be looking at another has-been dinosaur patent troll (a.k.a. I honestly think it's time for this dinosaur company to go out of business and wouldn't miss them one bit if they did - they have been a joke for over half a decade now and are refusing to compete on either price or performance in any meaningful way, despite being massively behind their direct competitor whilst outside competitors are already knocking on their door and about to blow them out of the water (and I'm not even talking about AMD - Apple Silicon and RISCV competitors at a fraction of their size are going to mop the floor with Intel in the next year or two in both efficiency and performance).

#Cannon digi troll iv motherboard driver#

AMD and Nvidia provide dozens of driver release and around 5-10 years of support for their GPUs compared to Intel who at best release one or two updates per year for around 2 years (with the exception of their re-hashed iGPUs that stayed the same for multiple generations, since they haven't bothered to change barely anything in them for around half a decade now besides some minor tweaks). We could argue about whether the iGPU would be useful or not if Intel were at least somewhat serious about driver support - which has been basically non-existent since forever. Nobody's buying enthusiast level performance CPUs for 'good enough' performance, let alone for their garbage throwaway GPUs and this launch (if true) is a complete embarrassment from Intel and their useless bean-counter CEO. And this is assuming they do not get another big security exploit which will take their performance advantage away post-patch (practically guaranteed at this point with their rehashed old architecture).Īnd what's going to be 'plenty' for a long time is irrelevant.

Quad cores have been good enough for so long so far only because of Intel's maintained monopoly on the desktop market (which they no longer have).

Nobody's buying high end desktop CPUs for 'good enough' performance today. We've had 8 cores being the standard now in sub-300 USD gaming consoles for 7 years - that's already the BARE MINIMUM. At best, I would possibly look at getting it for older legacy programs that have trouble scaling with more cores, but there are barely any left at this point.

#Cannon digi troll iv motherboard pro#

Win-7 pro x3 and Linux Cinnamon 20.2x2 & win-10 & 11pro x3įirst off, no I wouldn't want to buy a hypothetical quad core - even if it was 2x faster than 8/12 core CPUs (which is never going to happen anyway).

#Cannon digi troll iv motherboard plus#

Trident-Z 3600C16 4x8gb & Trident-Z Royal 4000c16 2x16gb & Trident-Z 3200c14 4x8gbġ080ti FTW3 & Titan Xp & evga 980ti gamingĩ70 evo plus 500gb & 970 evo 500gb many sammy 2.5' ssd's and WD BLK hdd'sġ-AOC G2460PG 24'G-Sync 144Hz/ 2nd 1-ASUS VG248QE 24'/ 3rd LG 43' seriesĭ450 second floor for 2nd rad x2/ Cherry Entertainment center on Test benchīuilt in Realtek x2 with 2-Insignia 2.0 sound bars & 1-LG sound barĮVGA 1200P2 & 1000P2 with APC AX1500 & 850P2 with CyberPower-GX1325U & 750P2

X299 Rampage VI Apex & z490 Maximus XII Apex & x99 Sabertoothĭ5 combo/280 GTX/ VRM water block copper/280 GTX/ D5 Top/Optimus sigV2/TitanXp/Mora 360x2 9940x w/Optimus SigV2 & 10900k w/Optimus Foundation & 5930k w/Noctua D15